|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity Resources
This page provides links to relevant and related websites, reports, court filings and news articles related to affirmative action, legal and societal problems and solutions related to it. Some of the links can be found elsewhere on this site, while others provide useful information that may not have corresponded to the particular issues highlighted within the contents of this site.
American Bar Association Speaks Out 2006
____________________________________________________________________________________________ American Bar Association Speaks Out (adopted by House of Delegates in August 2006)
____________________________________________________________________________________________
There is no one single cause that leads to the disparaties in representation of diverse groups in higher education. There is also no simple solution. The following links address the Pipeline Problem, the Fear Factor and the LSAT Problem.
A large factor contributing to the lack of diversity in higher education in general, and in the law school context in particular, is the shortage of qualified minority high school graduates applying to four-year universities. This is often referred to as the "Pipeline Problem." The issue has been summarized thusly: "To the extent that lower college attendance by black and Hispanic students is attributable to lower college readiness rates, it cannot be attributed to insufficient financial aid or inadequate affirmative action policies."
Related Articles: The Next Generation: Can law firms help these kids make it to law school? from Minority Law Journal, Fall 2006
____________________________________________________________________________________________ St. John's Law Review Winter 2006 by Phoebe A. Haddon and Deborah W. Post
http://academic.udayton.edu/thewhitestlawschools/2005twls/chapter2/LSA%20Practices.pdf
LSAC calls for schools to reassess use of LSAT
____________________________________________________________________________________________
The Civil Rights Project at Harvard
www.affirmativeactionadvocacy.com
Focus on Affirmative Action, A project of the African American Policy Forum 13 Myths About Affirmative Action: A Special Series on a Public Policy Under Siege:
Washington Post Special Report on Affirmative Action http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/affirm/affirm.htm
Affirmative Action Timeline http://www.infoplease.com/spot/affirmativetimeline1.html#2000
University of Michigan's Undergraduate Admissions Point System
The African American Policy Forum March 27-28 Affirmative Action Conference (transcripts from 2003)
FairChance
The History of Affirmative Action Policies
____________________________________________________________________________________________
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc University of Michigan Affirmative Action
From Bakke to Grutter and Gratz by Katherine C. Naff LandmarkCases.Org Background on Bakke
University of Michigan Admissions Lawsuits Websites http://www.umich.edu/pres/aate/
http://www.vpcomm.umich.edu/admissions/new/
Articles related to the Amicus Briefs:
essence of a rich and rewarding human experience.
Attaining a diverse student body is at the heart of the Law School's proper institutional mission "Attaining a diverse student body is at the heart of the Law School's proper institutional mission, and its "good faith" is "presumed" absent "a showing to the contrary." Id., at 318-319, 57 L Ed 2d 750, 98 S Ct 2733. Enrolling a "critical mass" of minority students simply to assure some specified percentage of a particular group merely because of its race or ethnic origin would be patently unconstitutional. E.g., id., at 307, 57 L Ed 2d 750, 98 S Ct 2733. But the Law School defines its critical mass concept by reference to the substantial, important, and laudable educational benefits that diversity is designed to produce, including cross-racial understanding and the breaking down of racial stereotypes. The Law School's claim is further bolstered by numerous expert studies and reports showing that such diversity promotes learning outcomes and better prepares students for an increasingly diverse workforce, for society, and for the legal profession. Major American businesses have made clear that the skills needed in today's increasingly global marketplace can only be developed through exposure to widely diverse people, cultures, ideas, and viewpoints. High-ranking retired officers and civilian military leaders assert that a highly qualified, racially diverse officer corps is essential to national security. Moreover, because universities, and in particular, law schools, represent the training ground for a large number of the Nation's leaders, Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629, 634, 94 L. Ed. 1114, 70 S. Ct. 848, the path to leadership must be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity. Thus, the Law School has a compelling interest [***322] in attaining a diverse student body."
____________________________________________________________________________________________
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc. Threatening Brown: Supreme Court Challenges to Voluntary Integration Cases
Social Science Statement for Voluntary Integration Cases
Voluntary School Integration under Threat
The Century Foundation Event - The Future of School Integration: Race, Class and the U.S. Supreme Court, transcript November 2006
Argument Transcript Meredith v. Jefferson
|
|
|
| Lawyering in the Digital Age Clinic-Cristina Quintero & Jeffrey Penn | All Rights Reserved [2007] |