![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |
A Broken System:
| ||||||||
| James S. Liebman Simon H. Rifkind Professor of Law Columbia University School of Law | Jeffrey Fagan Professor, Joseph Mailman School of Public Health Visiting Professor, Columbia University School of Law Valerie West |
In 1991 the Chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on the Judiciary asked
Professor James Liebman of the Columbia University School of Law to
calculate the frequency of relief in habeas corpus cases. In late
1995, the
study was expanded from a single count of cases and their outcomes to a
search for information that might help explain why relief is granted in
so
many capital cases.
No such undertaking had ever before been attempted.
The results are so startling, that The Justice Project is trying to
make
them as widely available as possible.
It is important to note that Professor Liebman's work was begun nearly
a
decade before the current national debate on the death penalty, and his
results would have appeared this spring, no matter what the results or
public opinion of our capital punishment system. |
| There are two options for downloading. Users with a high-speed Internet connection can download the study or appendices as one complete file. The study and appendices have also been broken up into smaller files (indicated here as Part 1, Part 2, etc.) for downloading by users with slower Internet connections. | |
Full Report and Endnotes
Report - Part 1 |
Appendices
Appendices - Part 1 |
(Notes: You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or print the full report or appendices, which are in PDF format. The Appendices contain mathmatic/typographic symbols that may not display properly on computers that lack the fonts used to generate these symbols. We are currently working to convert these symbols into a unversally accessible format.)
Executive Summary
Acknowledgements
Appendix A:
State Capital Punishment Report Cards
(Note: You will need the Adobe Acrobat Reader to view or print the state/national report cards or Table 30, which are in PDF format.)
Appendix B:
Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Examples of Serious Error Warranting State
Post-Conviction or Federal Habeas Corpus Relief; with
Contact Information All content © 2000. James S. Liebman, Jeffrey Fagan, Valerie West.Description of Information in State Capital Punishment Report Cards
National Composite Capital Punishment Report Card
Table 30: State-by-State Comparisons of Direct Appeal, State Post-Conviction, and Federal Habeas Corpus Reversal
Rates and Overall Error Rates
Alabama Capital Punishment Report Card
Arizona Capital Punishment Report Card
Arkansas Capital Punishment Report Card
California Capital Punishment Report Card
Delaware Capital Punishment Report Card
Florida Capital Punishment Report Card
Georgia Capital Punishment Report Card
Idaho Capital Punishment Report Card
Illinois Capital Punishment Report Card
Indiana Capital Punishment Report Card
Kentucky Capital Punishment Report Card
Louisiana Capital Punishment Report Card
Maryland Capital Punishment Report Card
Mississippi Capital Punishment Report Card
Missouri Capital Punishment Report Card
Montana Capital Punishment Report Card
Nebraska Capital Punishment Report Card
Nevada Capital Punishment Report Card
North Carolina Capital Punishment Report Card
Oklahoma Capital Punishment Report Card
Pennsylvania Capital Punishment Report Card
South Carolina Capital Punishment Report Card
Tennessee Capital Punishment Report Card
Texas Capital Punishment Report Card
Utah Capital Punishment Report Card
Virginia Capital Punishment Report Card
Washington Capital Punishment Report Card
Wyoming Capital Punishment Report Card
Federal Circuit Court and Regional Capital Punishment Report Cards (available in PDF format)
Description of Information in Circuit and Regional Capital Punishment Report Cards
Third Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Fourth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Fifth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Sixth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Seventh Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Eighth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Ninth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Tenth Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Eleventh Circuit Capital Punishment Report Card
Incomplete List of Capital Judgments Reversed on State Post-Conviction or Related Types of Review (available in PDF format)
Introduction and Key
Summary of National Composite Results
Alabama
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maryland
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
North Carolina
Oklahoma
Pennsylvania
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Virginia
Washington
Wyoming
Examples of Serious Error Warranting Federal Habeas Corpus Relief
(Appendix D is also available in PDF format)
Tables and Figures (available in PDF format)
Table 1: Overall Error Rates and Percent Death Sentences Carried Out, by State, 1973-1995
Table 2: Death Row Population, Executions, and Percent Executed, 1973-1999
Table 3: State and Federal Reversals by Year, 1973-1995
Table 9: Overall Error Rates, by State, 1973-1995 Excluding State Post-Conviction
Figure 11: Combined Error Rates on State Direct Appeal and Federal Habeas, 1973-95
Table 11: Years from First Death Sentence to First Non-Consensual Execution, 1973-2000
Table 12: Average Years from Death Sentence to Execution, 1973-95
Table 13: Proportion of 1973-1995 Death Sentences Awaiting State Direct Review as of 1995
Table 14: Death Sentences Per 1,000 Homicides, 1973-1995
Table 15: Death Sentences Per 100,000 Population, 1973-1995
Table 16: Death Sentences Per 1,000 Prison Population, 1973-1995
Table 17: Non-Consensual Executions Per 1,000 Homicides, 1973-1995
Table 18: Non-Consensual Executions Per 100,000 Population, 1973-1995
Table 19: Non-Consensual Executions Per 1,000 Prison Population, 1973-1995
Table 20: Average Homicides Per 100,000 Population, 1973-1995
Table 21: Average Percent of Population that is Non-White, 1973-1995
Table 22: Index of Political Pressure on State Courts
Table 23: State Expenditures Per Capita on Courts, 1973-95
Table 24: State Court Criminal Cases Per 1,000 Population, 1973-95
Table 26: Death Sentences Per 100,000 Population by Region, 1973-1995
Table 27: Non-Consensual Executions Per 100,000 Population by Region, 1973-1995
Table 28: Percent of Death Sentences Carried Out (All Executions), 1973-1995
Table 29: Percent of Death Sentences Carried Out (Non-Consensual Executions), 1973-1995
Figure 36: Percent Death Sentences Carried Out (Non-Consensual Executions), 1973-1995
This document was produced as a supplement to the original study and appendices.